WASHINGTON (AFP) – Scientists have known for several months the new coronavirus can become suspended in micro-droplets expelled by patients when they speak and breathe, but until now there was no proof that these tiny particles are infectious.
A new study by scientists at the University of Nebraska that was uploaded to a medical preprint site this week has shown for the first time that Sars-CoV-2 taken from microdroplets, defined as under five microns, can replicate in lab conditions.
This boosts the hypothesis that normal speaking and breathing, not just coughing and sneezing, are responsible for spreading Covid-19 – and that infectious doses of the virus can travel distances far greater than the two meters urged by social distancing guidelines.
The results are still considered preliminary and have not yet appeared in a peer-reviewed journal, which would lend more credibility to the methods devised by the scientists.
The paper was posted to the medrxiv.org website, where most cutting-edge research during the pandemic has first been made public.
The same team wrote a paper in March showing that the virus remains airborne in the rooms of hospitalised Covid-19 patients, and this study will soon be published in a journal, according to the lead author.
“It is actually fairly difficult” to collect the samples, Joshua Santarpia, an associate professor at the University of Nebraska Medical Centre told AFP.
They then placed these samples into a culture to make them grow, finding that three of the 18 samples tested were able to replicate.
For Santarpia, this represents proof that micro-droplets, which also travel much greater distances than big droplets, are capable of infecting people.
“It is replicated in cell culture and therefore infectious,” he said.
The potential for micro-droplet transmission of the coronavirus was at one stage thought to be improbable by health authorities across the world.
Later, scientists began to change their mind and acknowledge it may be a possibility, which is the rationale for universal masking.
The World Health Organisation was among the last to shift its position, doing so on July 7.
“I feel like the debate has become more political than scientific,” said Santarpia.
“I think most scientists that work on infectious diseases agree that there’s likely an airborne component, though we may quibble over how large.” Linsey Marr, a professor at Virginia Tech who is a leading expert on aerial transmission of viruses and wasn’t involved in the study, said it was rare to obtain measurements of the amount of virus present in air.
“Based on what we know about other diseases and what we know so far about Sars-CoV-2, I think we can assume that if the virus is ‘infectious in aerosols,’ then we can become infected by breathing them in,” she told AFP.